Re: [2.6.22.2 review 09/84] Fix rfkill IRQ flags.

On Aug 7 2007 13:43, Greg KH wrote:
>
>added this 64-bit bug:
>
>        ....
>	unsigned int flags;
>
> 	spin_lock_irqsave(&task->lock, flags);
>        ....
>
>irq 'flags' must be unsigned long, not unsigned int. The -rt tree has
>strict checks about this on 64-bit so this triggered a build failure.

Since the check is a compile-time one, would not it be good to add
it to the regular linux tree too?


	Jan
-- 
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: [2.6.22.2 review 09/84] Fix rfkill IRQ flags.
    • From: Alexey Dobriyan <[email protected]>

• References:
  • [2.6.22.2 review 09/84] Fix rfkill IRQ flags.
    • From: Greg KH <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH] Add linux/elfcore-compat.h
• Next by Date: [PATCH 25/25] driver core: Implement tagged directory support for device classes.
• Previous by thread: [2.6.22.2 review 09/84] Fix rfkill IRQ flags.
• Next by thread: Re: [2.6.22.2 review 09/84] Fix rfkill IRQ flags.
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]