Re: [PATCH][RESEND] Semi-pointless NULL test in uli526x driver

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Jesper Juhl wrote:
On 07/08/07, Jeff Garzik <[email protected]> wrote:
Jesper Juhl wrote:
(resending previously submitted patch from 16/7-2007 22:40)


Hi,

In drivers/net/tulip/uli526x.c::uli526x_interrupt() there's a test
of the function argument 'void *dev_id' against NULL. But that
test is pretty pointless, since if ever 'dev_id' is NULL we'll
already have crashed inside "netdev_priv(dev)".

I don't think dev_id can ever actually be NULL, so the whole block
inside "if (!dev) {" could probably just go away. But I guess
there's a good reason someone put that ULI526X_DBUG() in there - and
if 'dev_id' /can/ actually be NULL then it's nice to have and in
that case this patch actually fixes a possible crash (hence the
version number update).
So I guess that in this case we should just move the
"db = netdev_priv(dev)" assignment past that NULL test. That's what
this patch does.

Found by the Coverity checker.
Compile tested.


PS. Please keep me on Cc when replying.


Signed-off-by: Jesper Juhl <[email protected]>
Just remove the dev==NULL test...


Hmm, it would seem there's some disagreement about that :

On 04/08/07, Kyle McMartin <[email protected]> wrote:
...
It *can* be null, in the case of another handler being registered on the
same irq number, passing NULL for the cookie.

Ack. Will apply.

Regards,
        Kyle


I'll let you and Kyle fight it out :-)


My official opinion (for net drivers and ATA at least): It is pointless having such a check in the hottest of driver hot paths, since a large majority of drivers do not have such a check.

It is better to fix the extremely rare oddball that passes NULL to request_irq(), than to update all drivers to be slower due to the oddballs.

	Jeff


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux