Re: [ckrm-tech] Circular Locking Dependency Chain detected in containers code

On 8/7/07, Peter Zijlstra <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> The typical annotation would be using spin_lock_nested/mutex_lock_nested
> with a non-0 nesting level for this one case.
>

OK, I'll look into this when I get back from vacation.

Thanks,

Paul
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• References:
  • Circular Locking Dependency Chain detected in containers code
    • From: Dhaval Giani <[email protected]>
  • Re: [ckrm-tech] Circular Locking Dependency Chain detected in containers code
    • From: "Paul Menage" <[email protected]>
  • Re: [ckrm-tech] Circular Locking Dependency Chain detected in containers code
    • From: Peter Zijlstra <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: Disk spin down issue on shut down/suspend to disk
• Next by Date: GPL / MPL license issues.
• Previous by thread: Re: [ckrm-tech] Circular Locking Dependency Chain detected in containers code
• Next by thread: i386: kernel boot fail at check_irq_resend:69
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]