Re: [patch 3/4] sdio: extend sdio_readsb() and friends to handle any length of buffer

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, 07 Aug 2007 13:55:12 +0100
David Vrabel <[email protected]> wrote:

> sdio: extend sdio_readsb() and friends to handle any length of buffer
> 
> Extend sdio_readsb(), sdio_writesb(), sdio_memcpy_fromio(), and
> sdio_memcpy_toio() to handle any length of buffer by splitting the
> transfer into several IO_RW_EXTENDED commands. Typically, a transfer
> would be split into a single block mode transfer followed by a byte
> mode transfer for the remainder.
> 
> For this to work the block size must be limited to the maximum size
> of a byte mode transfer (512 bytes).  This limitation could be
> revisited if there are any cards out there that require a block size
> > 512.
> 
> host->max_seg_size <= host->max_req_size so there's no need to check
> both when determining the maximum data size for a single command.
> 
> Signed-off-by: David Vrabel <[email protected]>
> ---
> Index: mmc/drivers/mmc/core/sdio_io.c
> ===================================================================
> --- mmc.orig/drivers/mmc/core/sdio_io.c	2007-08-07
> 07:27:31.000000000 +0100 +++ mmc/drivers/mmc/core/sdio_io.c
> 2007-08-07 07:35:02.000000000 +0100 @@ -153,6 +153,13 @@
>  {
>  	int ret;
>  
> +	/* The standard permits block sizes up to 2048 bytes, but
> +	 * sdio_readsb() etc. can only work with block size <= 512.
> */
> +	if (blksz > 512) {
> +		blksz = 512;
> +		dev_warn(&func->dev, "block size limited to 512
> bytes\n");
> +	}
> +

I'm not sure about not returning an error here. What if a driver calls
it and relies on being able to transfer >512 blocks?

>  	ret = mmc_io_rw_direct(func->card, 1, 0,
>  		SDIO_FBR_BASE(func->num) + SDIO_FBR_BLKSIZE,
>  		blksz & 0xff, NULL);
> @@ -227,6 +234,48 @@
>  
>  EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(sdio_writeb);
>  
> +/* Split an arbitrarily sized data transfer into several
> + * IO_RW_EXTENDED commands. */
> +static int sdio_io_rw_ext_helper(struct sdio_func *func, int write,
> +	unsigned fn, unsigned addr, int incr_addr, u8 *buf, unsigned
> size) +{
> +	unsigned remainder = size;
> +	unsigned max_blocks;
> +	int ret;
> +

We need to check support for block transfers here as well.

Also, the parameter fn is redundant.

> @@ -109,18 +109,22 @@
>  	cmd.opcode = SD_IO_RW_EXTENDED;
>  	cmd.arg = write ? 0x80000000 : 0x00000000;
>  	cmd.arg |= fn << 28;
> -	cmd.arg |= bang ? 0x00000000 : 0x04000000;
> +	cmd.arg |= incr_addr ? 0x04000000 : 0x00000000;
>  	cmd.arg |= addr << 9;
> -	cmd.arg |= (size == 512) ? 0 : size;
> +	if (blocks > 1) {

|| blksz > 512

Rgds
-- 
     -- Pierre Ossman

  Linux kernel, MMC maintainer        http://www.kernel.org
  PulseAudio, core developer          http://pulseaudio.org
  rdesktop, core developer          http://www.rdesktop.org
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux