Re: [RFC, PATCH] handle the multi-threaded init's exit() properly

On Mon, 6 Aug 2007 23:34:31 -0700 [email protected] wrote:

> | The downside of this approach is that
> | handle-the-multi-threaded-inits-exit-properly.patch looks more 2.6.24-ready
> | than all the container stuff (based just on overall impact and
> | speculativeness)
> 
> Well, if it will help, we can drop these two patches from -mm, take Oleg's
> patch and I can then resend these along with other pid ns patches. 
> 
> 	pid-namespaces-define-and-use-task_active_pid_ns-wrapper.patch.
> 	pid-namespaces-rename-child_reaper-function.patch

I'm reasonably sure that what I ended up with is OK.  I'll send those two
out again for double-checking, please.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

References:
- [RFC, PATCH] handle the multi-threaded init's exit() properly
  - From: Oleg Nesterov <[email protected]>
- Re: [RFC, PATCH] handle the multi-threaded init's exit() properly
  - From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
- Re: [RFC, PATCH] handle the multi-threaded init's exit() properly
  - From: Oleg Nesterov <[email protected]>
- Re: [RFC, PATCH] handle the multi-threaded init's exit() properly
  - From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
- Re: [RFC, PATCH] handle the multi-threaded init's exit() properly
  - From: [email protected]

Prev by Date: Re: 2.6.20->2.6.21 - networking dies after random time
Next by Date: Re: Problems with timerfd()
Previous by thread: Re: [RFC, PATCH] handle the multi-threaded init's exit() properly
Next by thread: OOPS in shrink_dcache_for_umount
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Kernel Newbies] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Photo] [Stuff] [Gimp] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Video 4 Linux] [Linux for the blind] [Linux Resources]