Re: about modularization

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: Mitchell Erblich <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: about modularization
From: Rene Herman <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 06 Aug 2007 22:50:00 +0200
Cc: [email protected], Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>, "T. J. Brumfield" <[email protected]>
In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
References: <[email protected]>
Sender: [email protected]
User-agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.6 (X11/20070728)

On 08/06/2007 10:20 PM, Mitchell Erblich wrote:

    Thus, a hybrid schedular approach could be taken
    that would default to a single uni-processor schedular

What a brilliant idea in a world where buying a non multi core CPU isgetting to be only somewhat easier than a non SMT one...


Rene.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

References:
- Re: about modularization
  - From: "Mitchell Erblich" <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: [PATCH] SCTP: fix IPv4 addr in SCTPv6 accept()/getpeername()
Next by Date: Re: [linux-pm] Re: [PATCH] kexec: fix pci device initialization fail after kexec (2.6.23-rc2). (Related to e1000 doesn't resume properly from standby)
Previous by thread: Re: about modularization
Next by thread: Re: about modularization
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Kernel Newbies] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Photo] [Stuff] [Gimp] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Video 4 Linux] [Linux for the blind] [Linux Resources]

Powered by Linux