"Luiz Fernando N. Capitulino" <[email protected]> writes: > > I'll manage to test it then. Do you have a test-case or has any > suggestion? LTP has some simple test cases for modify_ldt -Andi - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH] i386: convert mm_context_t semaphore to a mutex
- From: "Luiz Fernando N. Capitulino" <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] i386: convert mm_context_t semaphore to a mutex
- References:
- [PATCH] i386: convert mm_context_t semaphore to a mutex
- From: "Luiz Fernando N. Capitulino" <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] i386: convert mm_context_t semaphore to a mutex
- From: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] i386: convert mm_context_t semaphore to a mutex
- From: "Luiz Fernando N. Capitulino" <[email protected]>
- [PATCH] i386: convert mm_context_t semaphore to a mutex
- Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH 00/10] foundations for reserve-based allocation
- Next by Date: Re: [PATCH] kexec: fix pci device initialization fail after kexec (2.6.23-rc2). (Related to e1000 doesn't resume properly from standby)
- Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH] i386: convert mm_context_t semaphore to a mutex
- Next by thread: Re: [PATCH] i386: convert mm_context_t semaphore to a mutex
- Index(es):