Willy Tarreau wrote:
>
> I'm well aware of that, even in the example I wrote to reproduce the issue
> and posted to gcc's bugzilla, I clearly have one function prototype and a
> separate asm statement which contained a label with the function's name.
>
> So in my opinion, the code above is not buggy. It's dirty (though I did
> not find how to produce the equivalent in a different manner).
>
Well, top-level assembly is usually nasty. Setting the section in the
assembly statement as you said is probably the only thing you *can* do.
I don't think there is any requirement that top-level assembly
statements get the section set to .text on their behalf.
-hpa
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
