On Monday, 6 August 2007 11:29, Johannes Berg wrote:
> On Mon, 2007-08-06 at 11:07 +0200, Pavel Machek wrote:
> > Hi!
> >
> > > +config SUSPEND_UP_POSSIBLE
> > > + bool
> > > + depends on (X86 && !X86_VOYAGER) || (PPC32 && PPC_MPC52xx) \
> > > + || (PPC64 && (PPC_PSERIES || PPC_PMAC)) || ARM || BLACKFIN \
> > > + || MIPS || SUPERH || FRV
> > > + depends on !SMP
> > > + default y
> >
> > I guess I'd rather left SUSPEND_UP_POSSIBLE to allways y (as it always
> > was), and let architectures that can't handle it not return "mem"
> > from list of valid states...
>
> Yeah, that's the utterly broken interface we used to have. Until I fixed
> it to have no valid states until architectures implement suspend_ops.
> Still, I disagree, why bother with compiling code that can't ever be
> used?
Yes, that's the idea.
BTW, Pavel please see: http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/8/3/303
Greetings,
Rafael
--
"Premature optimization is the root of all evil." - Donald Knuth
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
