On 04/08/07, Christoph Hellwig <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 04, 2007 at 08:31:32PM +0200, Jesper Juhl wrote:
> > (resending trivial patch, originally from 18/6-2007 02:33)
> >
> >
> > Just to make things clear in the light of recent discussions about
> > licensing.
> > Stuff I contribute to the Linux kernel are licensed under the terms of the
> > GPL version 2.
>
> This really doesn't elong into CREDITS. If you're not good enough with
> the general GPLv2 stance add additional diclaimers to the files you've
> made changes to (in an extent that is copyrightable)
>
Ok, I can live with that.
I just got paranoid after all the recent GVLv2 vs GPLv3 flamewars and
though it would be best to just add some explicit note somewhere and
couldn't find a more appropriate place than CREDITS to do so.
Feel free to drop this patch...
--
Jesper Juhl <[email protected]>
Don't top-post http://www.catb.org/~esr/jargon/html/T/top-post.html
Plain text mails only, please http://www.expita.com/nomime.html
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
