El Sat, 4 Aug 2007 18:37:33 +0200, Ingo Molnar <[email protected]> escribió: > thousands of applications. So for most file workloads we give Windows a > 20%-30% performance edge, for almost nothing. (for RAM-starved kernel > builds the performance difference between atime and noatime+nodiratime > setups is more on the order of 40%) Just curious - do you have numbers with relatime? - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH 00/23] per device dirty throttling -v8
- From: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 00/23] per device dirty throttling -v8
- References:
- [PATCH 00/23] per device dirty throttling -v8
- From: Peter Zijlstra <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 00/23] per device dirty throttling -v8
- From: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 00/23] per device dirty throttling -v8
- From: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 00/23] per device dirty throttling -v8
- From: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 00/23] per device dirty throttling -v8
- From: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 00/23] per device dirty throttling -v8
- From: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 00/23] per device dirty throttling -v8
- From: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
- [PATCH 00/23] per device dirty throttling -v8
- Prev by Date: Re: Distributed storage.
- Next by Date: Re: PROBLEM: many problems with mac80211, iwlwifi and ACPI on Santa Rosa laptop
- Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH 00/23] per device dirty throttling -v8
- Next by thread: Re: [PATCH 00/23] per device dirty throttling -v8
- Index(es):
 |