Re: [PATCH 00/23] per device dirty throttling -v8

El Sat, 4 Aug 2007 18:37:33 +0200, Ingo Molnar <[email protected]> escribió:

> thousands of applications. So for most file workloads we give Windows a 
> 20%-30% performance edge, for almost nothing. (for RAM-starved kernel 
> builds the performance difference between atime and noatime+nodiratime 
> setups is more on the order of 40%)

Just curious - do you have numbers with relatime?
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH 00/23] per device dirty throttling -v8
  - From: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>

References:
- [PATCH 00/23] per device dirty throttling -v8
  - From: Peter Zijlstra <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 00/23] per device dirty throttling -v8
  - From: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 00/23] per device dirty throttling -v8
  - From: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 00/23] per device dirty throttling -v8
  - From: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 00/23] per device dirty throttling -v8
  - From: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 00/23] per device dirty throttling -v8
  - From: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 00/23] per device dirty throttling -v8
  - From: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: Re: Distributed storage.
Next by Date: Re: PROBLEM: many problems with mac80211, iwlwifi and ACPI on Santa Rosa laptop
Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH 00/23] per device dirty throttling -v8
Next by thread: Re: [PATCH 00/23] per device dirty throttling -v8
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Kernel Newbies] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Photo] [Stuff] [Gimp] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Video 4 Linux] [Linux for the blind] [Linux Resources]