* Rene Herman <[email protected]> wrote:
> On 08/03/2007 03:19 PM, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> > One of the authors of the IO scheduler code said it on lkml recently
> > that while modularization of IO scheduler had advantages too, in
> > retrospect he wishes they would not have made IO schedulers modular
> > and now that decision cannot be undone.
>
> Just as a matter of interest -- why can't it? (a pointer to a list
> archive if you have one, or a name so I can look for it myself if you
> don't, will do as answer).
some apps depend on AS, some on CFQ, and once you expose something to
users it's _very_ hard to remove it, even if the technical arguments are
strong.
http://lists.openwall.net/linux-kernel/2007/04/16/23
Ingo
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
