Re: [PATCH 1/1] lro: Generic Large Receive Offload for TCP traffic

[Jörn Engel <joern@logfs.org>]

On Fri, 3 August 2007 14:41:19 +0200, Jan-Bernd Themann wrote:
> 
> This patch provides generic Large Receive Offload (LRO) functionality
> for IPv4/TCP traffic.
> 
> LRO combines received tcp packets to a single larger tcp packet and 
> passes them then to the network stack in order to increase performance
> (throughput). The interface supports two modes: Drivers can either pass
> SKBs or fragment lists to the LRO engine. 

Maybe this is a stupid question, but why is LRO done at the device
driver level?

If it is a unversal performance benefit, I would have expected it to be
done generically, i.e. have all packets moved into network layer pass
through LRO instead.

> +void lro_flush_pkt(struct net_lro_mgr *lro_mgr,
> +		   struct iphdr *iph, struct tcphdr *tcph);

In particular this bit looks like it should be driven by a timeout,
which would be settable via /proc/sys/net/core/lro_timeout or similar.

Jörn

-- 
Rules of Optimization:
Rule 1: Don't do it.
Rule 2 (for experts only): Don't do it yet.
-- M.A. Jackson
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/