Re: gcc fixed size char array initialization bug - known?

On Thu, Aug 02, 2007 at 03:54:34PM -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> > 
> > And, Stefan, there is a perfect way to specify a "0123" without the '\0' - 
> > {'0', '1', '2', '3'}.
> 
> We are actually a bit beyond traditional K&R, fwiw.

Not in that area - this behaviour is precisely what traditional K&R
had all along.  Unchanged.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• References:
  • gcc fixed size char array initialization bug - known?
    • From: Guennadi Liakhovetski <[email protected]>
  • Re: gcc fixed size char array initialization bug - known?
    • From: Andi Kleen <[email protected]>
  • Re: gcc fixed size char array initialization bug - known?
    • From: Guennadi Liakhovetski <[email protected]>
  • Re: gcc fixed size char array initialization bug - known?
    • From: Stefan Richter <[email protected]>
  • Re: gcc fixed size char array initialization bug - known?
    • From: Guennadi Liakhovetski <[email protected]>
  • Re: gcc fixed size char array initialization bug - known?
    • From: Randy Dunlap <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: gcc fixed size char array initialization bug - known?
• Next by Date: Re: scripts/mod/file2alias.c cross compile problem
• Previous by thread: Re: gcc fixed size char array initialization bug - known?
• Next by thread: Re: gcc fixed size char array initialization bug - known?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]