On Thu, Aug 02, 2007 at 03:54:34PM -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> >
> > And, Stefan, there is a perfect way to specify a "0123" without the '\0' -
> > {'0', '1', '2', '3'}.
>
> We are actually a bit beyond traditional K&R, fwiw.
Not in that area - this behaviour is precisely what traditional K&R
had all along. Unchanged.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- References:
- gcc fixed size char array initialization bug - known?
- From: Guennadi Liakhovetski <g.liakhovetski@gmx.de>
- Re: gcc fixed size char array initialization bug - known?
- From: Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>
- Re: gcc fixed size char array initialization bug - known?
- From: Guennadi Liakhovetski <g.liakhovetski@gmx.de>
- Re: gcc fixed size char array initialization bug - known?
- From: Stefan Richter <stefanr@s5r6.in-berlin.de>
- Re: gcc fixed size char array initialization bug - known?
- From: Guennadi Liakhovetski <g.liakhovetski@gmx.de>
- Re: gcc fixed size char array initialization bug - known?
- From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xenotime.net>
- gcc fixed size char array initialization bug - known?
- Prev by Date: Re: gcc fixed size char array initialization bug - known?
- Next by Date: Re: scripts/mod/file2alias.c cross compile problem
- Previous by thread: Re: gcc fixed size char array initialization bug - known?
- Next by thread: Re: gcc fixed size char array initialization bug - known?
- Index(es):
 |