Re: gcc fixed size char array initialization bug - known?

On Thu, 2 Aug 2007, Al Viro wrote:

> On Thu, Aug 02, 2007 at 09:55:51PM +0200, Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote:
> > But do a
> > 
> > 	char c[4] = "0123";
> > 
> > and - a wonder - no warning.
> 
> And this is a correct behaviour.  You get a valid initialier for array;
> see 6.7.8[14] for details.  Moreover, that kind of code is often
> quite deliberate.

But why 4.2 warns?

Thanks
Guennadi
---
Guennadi Liakhovetski
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• References:
  • gcc fixed size char array initialization bug - known?
    • From: Guennadi Liakhovetski <[email protected]>
  • Re: gcc fixed size char array initialization bug - known?
    • From: Al Viro <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: gcc fixed size char array initialization bug - known?
• Next by Date: Re: [TULIP] Need new maintainer
• Previous by thread: Re: gcc fixed size char array initialization bug - known?
• Next by thread: Re: gcc fixed size char array initialization bug - known?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]