On Wed, 25 Jul 2007 08:32:43 +0200 Ulrich Kunitz wrote: [...] > Here is some output from objdump: > > $ objdump -x bin/sleep > > bin/sleep: file format elf64-x86-64 > bin/sleep > architecture: i386:x86-64, flags 0x00000102: > EXEC_P, D_PAGED > start address 0x000000000040014c > > Program Header: > PHDR off 0x0000000000000040 vaddr 0x0000000000400040 paddr 0x0000000000400040 align 2**3 > filesz 0x00000000000000e0 memsz 0x00000000000000e0 flags r-x > INTERP off 0x0000000000000120 vaddr 0x0000000000400120 paddr 0x0000000000400120 align 2**0 > filesz 0x000000000000002a memsz 0x000000000000002a flags r-- > LOAD off 0x0000000000000000 vaddr 0x0000000000400000 paddr 0x0000000000400000 align 2**21 > filesz 0x00000000000001c3 memsz 0x00000000000001c3 flags r-x > STACK off 0x0000000000000000 vaddr 0x0000000000000000 paddr 0x0000000000000000 align 2**3 > filesz 0x0000000000000000 memsz 0x0000000000000000 flags rwx > > Sections: > Idx Name Size VMA LMA File off Algn > 0 .interp 0000002a 0000000000400120 0000000000400120 00000120 2**0 > CONTENTS, ALLOC, LOAD, READONLY, DATA > 1 .text 00000059 000000000040014c 000000000040014c 0000014c 2**2 > CONTENTS, ALLOC, LOAD, READONLY, CODE > 2 .rodata 0000001e 00000000004001a5 00000000004001a5 000001a5 2**0 > CONTENTS, ALLOC, LOAD, READONLY, DATA > 3 .gnu_debuglink 0000000c 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 000001c3 2**0 > CONTENTS, READONLY > SYMBOL TABLE: > no symbols > > > $ objdump -x lib/klibc-7q-hWrI8UIRMp59zIo378Yl2X7A.so What version of klibc is this? > > lib/klibc-7q-hWrI8UIRMp59zIo378Yl2X7A.so: file format elf64-x86-64 > lib/klibc-7q-hWrI8UIRMp59zIo378Yl2X7A.so > architecture: i386:x86-64, flags 0x00000102: > EXEC_P, D_PAGED > start address 0x0000000000200200 > > Program Header: > LOAD off 0x0000000000000000 vaddr 0x0000000000200000 paddr 0x0000000000200000 align 2**21 > filesz 0x000000000001197e memsz 0x000000000001197e flags r-x > LOAD off 0x0000000000011980 vaddr 0x0000000000411980 paddr 0x0000000000411980 align 2**21 Note that the vaddr here can overlap the binary which is linked starting at 0x400000. This is the bug which I have found and fixed some time ago: http://git.kernel.org/?p=libs/klibc/klibc.git;a=commit;h=10df6dfb13ffefe716f12136bbc667f18ff64744 The fix was included in klibc-1.4.35, but does not seem to be applied in your case (the alignment is still 2**21 - it should be 2**20) - so either you are using an old klibc, or the "-z max-page-size=0x100000" option does not take effect for some reason. In my case the buggy klibc worked fine with a stock 2.6.18 kernel, but broke when the execshield patch was applied - and the commit 60bfba7e code comes from execshield, so it looks like the same problem. > filesz 0x0000000000000100 memsz 0x0000000000004288 flags rw- > STACK off 0x0000000000000000 vaddr 0x0000000000000000 paddr 0x0000000000000000 align 2**3 > filesz 0x0000000000000000 memsz 0x0000000000000000 flags rwx > > Sections: > Idx Name Size VMA LMA File off Algn > 0 .text 0000da94 0000000000200200 0000000000200200 00000200 2**2 > CONTENTS, ALLOC, LOAD, READONLY, CODE > 1 .rodata 00003cde 000000000020dca0 000000000020dca0 0000dca0 2**5 > CONTENTS, ALLOC, LOAD, READONLY, DATA > 2 .data 00000100 0000000000411980 0000000000411980 00011980 2**5 > CONTENTS, ALLOC, LOAD, DATA > 3 .bss 00004188 0000000000411a80 0000000000411a80 00011a80 2**5 > ALLOC > 4 .gnu_debuglink 0000002c 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 00011a80 2**0 > CONTENTS, READONLY > SYMBOL TABLE: > no symbols >
Attachment:
pgpKXVaZcvs00.pgp
Description: PGP signature
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Is PIE randomization breaking klibc binaries?
- From: "H. Peter Anvin" <[email protected]>
- Re: Is PIE randomization breaking klibc binaries?
- From: Ulrich Kunitz <[email protected]>
- Re: Is PIE randomization breaking klibc binaries?
- References:
- Is PIE randomization breaking klibc binaries?
- From: Ulrich Kunitz <[email protected]>
- Re: Is PIE randomization breaking klibc binaries?
- From: "H. Peter Anvin" <[email protected]>
- Re: Is PIE randomization breaking klibc binaries?
- From: Chuck Ebbert <[email protected]>
- Re: Is PIE randomization breaking klibc binaries?
- From: Chuck Ebbert <[email protected]>
- Re: Is PIE randomization breaking klibc binaries?
- From: Ulrich Kunitz <[email protected]>
- Re: Is PIE randomization breaking klibc binaries?
- From: Chuck Ebbert <[email protected]>
- Re: Is PIE randomization breaking klibc binaries?
- From: "H. Peter Anvin" <[email protected]>
- Re: Is PIE randomization breaking klibc binaries?
- From: Ulrich Kunitz <[email protected]>
- Is PIE randomization breaking klibc binaries?
- Prev by Date: Re: kupdate weirdness
- Next by Date: Re: scripts/mod/file2alias.c cross compile problem
- Previous by thread: Re: Is PIE randomization breaking klibc binaries?
- Next by thread: Re: Is PIE randomization breaking klibc binaries?
- Index(es):