> That's what "hdparm -u1" (or -u0) controls. Only some of the time. > Ingo's RT patches would probably fix all of this. The worst case IDE times we've seen for executing a single indivisible un-interruptible I/O cycle with a drive are around 1mS. Thats a hardware limit. Alan - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- References:
- Re: serial flow control appears broken
- From: Robert Hancock <[email protected]>
- Re: serial flow control appears broken
- From: Lee Howard <[email protected]>
- Re: serial flow control appears broken
- From: "Maciej W. Rozycki" <[email protected]>
- Re: serial flow control appears broken
- From: Lee Howard <[email protected]>
- Re: serial flow control appears broken
- From: "Maciej W. Rozycki" <[email protected]>
- Re: serial flow control appears broken
- From: Robert Hancock <[email protected]>
- Re: serial flow control appears broken
- From: Russell King <[email protected]>
- Re: serial flow control appears broken
- From: "Maciej W. Rozycki" <[email protected]>
- Re: serial flow control appears broken
- From: Mark Lord <[email protected]>
- Re: serial flow control appears broken
- From: Robert Hancock <[email protected]>
- Re: serial flow control appears broken
- From: Mark Lord <[email protected]>
- Re: serial flow control appears broken
- Prev by Date: Re: Is PIE randomization breaking klibc binaries?
- Next by Date: [PATCH][Fix] Hibernation: Do not try to mark invalid PFNs as nosave
- Previous by thread: Re: serial flow control appears broken
- Next by thread: Re: serial flow control appears broken
- Index(es):
 |