On Thu, Aug 02, 2007 at 05:36:45PM +0400, Michael Tokarev wrote: > not become required (it is slowly becoming - for example, some > packages on Debian (like xen for example) now explicitly depends > on udev - but so far I managed to satisfy this dependency by > other means). udev is not problem - problem si crazy default configuration of udev used by some distros. If you use udev with simple sane configuration, then it just creates device nodes based on kernel names. -- Elen sila lumenn' omentielvo Ondrej 'SanTiago' Zajicek (email: [email protected], jabber: [email protected]) OpenPGP encrypted e-mails preferred (KeyID 0x11DEADC3, wwwkeys.pgp.net) "To err is human -- to blame it on a computer is even more so."
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
- References:
- Re: VIA EPIA EK: strange eth dev numbering
- From: Herbert Rosmanith <[email protected]>
- renaming kernel devices [was: VIA EPIA EK: strange eth dev numbering]
- From: Michael Tokarev <[email protected]>
- Re: renaming kernel devices [was: VIA EPIA EK: strange eth dev numbering]
- From: Jan Engelhardt <[email protected]>
- Re: renaming kernel devices [was: VIA EPIA EK: strange eth dev numbering]
- From: Michael Tokarev <[email protected]>
- Re: renaming kernel devices [was: VIA EPIA EK: strange eth dev numbering]
- From: Jan Engelhardt <[email protected]>
- Re: renaming kernel devices [was: VIA EPIA EK: strange eth dev numbering]
- From: Michael Tokarev <[email protected]>
- Re: VIA EPIA EK: strange eth dev numbering
- Prev by Date: Re: [linux-usb-devel] 2.6.23-rc1-mm2
- Next by Date: [-mm patch] CPUfreq: Only check for transition latency on problematic governors
- Previous by thread: Re: renaming kernel devices [was: VIA EPIA EK: strange eth dev numbering]
- Next by thread: Re: renaming kernel devices [was: VIA EPIA EK: strange eth dev numbering]
- Index(es):
 |