Re: Is PIE randomization breaking klibc binaries?

On Thu, 2 Aug 2007, Ulrich Kunitz wrote:

> Here is the .config file. I used it directly with 60bfba7e8 and could 
> reproduce the bug. (All other builds after the patch could also 
> reproduce the bug.) 

Thanks, I used your .config against 60bfba7e8 on x86_64, and still can't 
seem to be able to reproduce the problem:

linux-w027:~ # echo "test" | ./klibc-1.5/usr/utils/shared/cat
test
linux-w027:~ # echo "test" | ./klibc-1.5/usr/utils/static/cat
test

hpa, were you successful reproducing this?

Bret, I can see that you also reported some related segfaults, what were 
your conditions that triggered it please?

-- 
Jiri Kosina
SUSE Labs
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: Is PIE randomization breaking klibc binaries?
    • From: "Bret Towe" <[email protected]>

• References:
  • Re: Is PIE randomization breaking klibc binaries?
    • From: Chuck Ebbert <[email protected]>
  • Re: Is PIE randomization breaking klibc binaries?
    • From: Ulrich Kunitz <[email protected]>
  • Re: Is PIE randomization breaking klibc binaries?
    • From: Chuck Ebbert <[email protected]>
  • Re: Is PIE randomization breaking klibc binaries?
    • From: "H. Peter Anvin" <[email protected]>
  • Re: Is PIE randomization breaking klibc binaries?
    • From: Ulrich Kunitz <[email protected]>
  • Re: Is PIE randomization breaking klibc binaries?
    • From: Jiri Kosina <[email protected]>
  • Re: Is PIE randomization breaking klibc binaries?
    • From: "H. Peter Anvin" <[email protected]>
  • Re: Is PIE randomization breaking klibc binaries?
    • From: Jiri Kosina <[email protected]>
  • Re: Is PIE randomization breaking klibc binaries?
    • From: "H. Peter Anvin" <[email protected]>
  • Re: Is PIE randomization breaking klibc binaries?
    • From: Jiri Kosina <[email protected]>
  • Re: Is PIE randomization breaking klibc binaries?
    • From: Ulrich Kunitz <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: cpufreq.c:(.text+0xaf178): undefined reference to `cpufreq_gov_performance'
• Next by Date: renaming kernel devices [was: VIA EPIA EK: strange eth dev numbering]
• Previous by thread: Re: Is PIE randomization breaking klibc binaries?
• Next by thread: Re: Is PIE randomization breaking klibc binaries?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]