On Thu, 2 Aug 2007, Ulrich Kunitz wrote: > Here is the .config file. I used it directly with 60bfba7e8 and could > reproduce the bug. (All other builds after the patch could also > reproduce the bug.) Thanks, I used your .config against 60bfba7e8 on x86_64, and still can't seem to be able to reproduce the problem: linux-w027:~ # echo "test" | ./klibc-1.5/usr/utils/shared/cat test linux-w027:~ # echo "test" | ./klibc-1.5/usr/utils/static/cat test hpa, were you successful reproducing this? Bret, I can see that you also reported some related segfaults, what were your conditions that triggered it please? -- Jiri Kosina SUSE Labs - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Is PIE randomization breaking klibc binaries?
- From: "Bret Towe" <[email protected]>
- Re: Is PIE randomization breaking klibc binaries?
- References:
- Re: Is PIE randomization breaking klibc binaries?
- From: Chuck Ebbert <[email protected]>
- Re: Is PIE randomization breaking klibc binaries?
- From: Ulrich Kunitz <[email protected]>
- Re: Is PIE randomization breaking klibc binaries?
- From: Chuck Ebbert <[email protected]>
- Re: Is PIE randomization breaking klibc binaries?
- From: "H. Peter Anvin" <[email protected]>
- Re: Is PIE randomization breaking klibc binaries?
- From: Ulrich Kunitz <[email protected]>
- Re: Is PIE randomization breaking klibc binaries?
- From: Jiri Kosina <[email protected]>
- Re: Is PIE randomization breaking klibc binaries?
- From: "H. Peter Anvin" <[email protected]>
- Re: Is PIE randomization breaking klibc binaries?
- From: Jiri Kosina <[email protected]>
- Re: Is PIE randomization breaking klibc binaries?
- From: "H. Peter Anvin" <[email protected]>
- Re: Is PIE randomization breaking klibc binaries?
- From: Jiri Kosina <[email protected]>
- Re: Is PIE randomization breaking klibc binaries?
- From: Ulrich Kunitz <[email protected]>
- Re: Is PIE randomization breaking klibc binaries?
- Prev by Date: Re: cpufreq.c:(.text+0xaf178): undefined reference to `cpufreq_gov_performance'
- Next by Date: renaming kernel devices [was: VIA EPIA EK: strange eth dev numbering]
- Previous by thread: Re: Is PIE randomization breaking klibc binaries?
- Next by thread: Re: Is PIE randomization breaking klibc binaries?
- Index(es):