Re: lmbench ctxsw regression with CFS

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



* Nick Piggin <[email protected]> wrote:

> > One thing to check out is whether the lmbench numbers are "correct". 
> > Especially on SMP systems, the lmbench numbers are actually *best* 
> > when the two processes run on the same CPU, even though that's not 
> > really at all the best scheduling - it's just that it artificially 
> > improves lmbench numbers because of the close cache affinity for the 
> > pipe data structures.
> 
> Yes, I bound them to a single core.

could you send me the .config you used?

	Ingo
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux