On 7/31/07, Ingo Molnar <[email protected]> wrote: > Almost all of the Reiser3 > code runs under the BKL, and the only other major kernel infrastructure > that has BKL dependencies is the TTY code. Also NFS: $ grep -rIi lock_kernel kernel-source/linux-2.6.17/fs/nfs/ | wc -l 94 Lee - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: SD still better than CFS for 3d ?(was Re: 2.6.23-rc1)
- From: "J. Bruce Fields" <[email protected]>
- Re: SD still better than CFS for 3d ?(was Re: 2.6.23-rc1)
- From: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
- Re: SD still better than CFS for 3d ?(was Re: 2.6.23-rc1)
- References:
- Linus 2.6.23-rc1
- From: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
- SD still better than CFS for 3d (was Re: 2.6.23-rc1)
- From: Kasper Sandberg <[email protected]>
- Re: SD still better than CFS for 3d ?(was Re: 2.6.23-rc1)
- From: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
- Re: SD still better than CFS for 3d ?(was Re: 2.6.23-rc1)
- From: Kasper Sandberg <[email protected]>
- Re: SD still better than CFS for 3d ?(was Re: 2.6.23-rc1)
- From: Peter Zijlstra <[email protected]>
- Re: SD still better than CFS for 3d ?(was Re: 2.6.23-rc1)
- From: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
- Linus 2.6.23-rc1
- Prev by Date: Re: lmbench ctxsw regression with CFS
- Next by Date: Re: lmbench ctxsw regression with CFS
- Previous by thread: Re: SD still better than CFS for 3d ?(was Re: 2.6.23-rc1)
- Next by thread: Re: SD still better than CFS for 3d ?(was Re: 2.6.23-rc1)
- Index(es):
 |