On 08/01, Daniel Walker wrote: > > On Wed, 2007-08-01 at 22:26 +0400, Oleg Nesterov wrote: > > > No, the "tail" option has nothing to do with prioritize, we can't remove > > it. Please look at the code. > > So you insert a work struct that executes last which wakes the flushing > thread? No, tail == 1 means a "normal" work, tail == 0 means "just after the ->current_work". Yes, the latter is to wake up the flusher at the "right time". Oleg. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- References:
- [PATCH] RT: Add priority-queuing and priority-inheritance to workqueue infrastructure
- From: Gregory Haskins <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] RT: Add priority-queuing and priority-inheritance to workqueue infrastructure
- From: Daniel Walker <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] RT: Add priority-queuing and priority-inheritance to workqueue infrastructure
- From: Peter Zijlstra <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] RT: Add priority-queuing and priority-inheritance to workqueue infrastructure
- From: Daniel Walker <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] RT: Add priority-queuing and priority-inheritance to workqueue infrastructure
- From: Oleg Nesterov <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] RT: Add priority-queuing and priority-inheritance to workqueue infrastructure
- From: Daniel Walker <[email protected]>
- [PATCH] RT: Add priority-queuing and priority-inheritance to workqueue infrastructure
- Prev by Date: Re: drbd 8.0.2/3 doesn't load under kernel 2.6.21
- Next by Date: Re: [PATCH 06/68] 0 -> NULL, for arch/frv
- Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH] RT: Add priority-queuing and priority-inheritance to workqueue infrastructure
- Next by thread: Re: [PATCH] RT: Add priority-queuing and priority-inheritance to workqueue infrastructure
- Index(es):
 |