Re: [PATCH] FRV: Make BSG declarations dependent on CONFIG_BLOCK

James Bottomley <[email protected]> wrote:

> Are you sure you're testing with git head?  CONFIG_BLK_DEV_BSG cannot be
> set unless CONFIG_BLOCK is (which was a bug in previous releases now
> fixed in git head ... unless the fix has gone wrong?).

Neither CONFIG_BLK_DEV_BSG nor CONFIG_BLOCK are set.  The problem is that the
stub BSG functions refer to undefined structures when CONFIG_BLOCK=n.

David
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: [PATCH] FRV: Make BSG declarations dependent on CONFIG_BLOCK
    • From: James Bottomley <[email protected]>

• References:
  • Re: [PATCH] FRV: Make BSG declarations dependent on CONFIG_BLOCK
    • From: James Bottomley <[email protected]>
  • [PATCH] FRV: Make BSG declarations dependent on CONFIG_BLOCK
    • From: David Howells <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: CFS review
• Next by Date: [RFC][PATCH] Coding style fix include/asm-blackfin/errno.h
• Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH] FRV: Make BSG declarations dependent on CONFIG_BLOCK
• Next by thread: Re: [PATCH] FRV: Make BSG declarations dependent on CONFIG_BLOCK
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]