* Roman Zippel <[email protected]> wrote: > while (1) > sched_yield(); sched_yield() is being reworked at the moment. But in general we want apps to move away to sane locking constructs ASAP. There's some movement in the 3D space at least. Ingo - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- References:
- x86 status was Re: -mm merge plans for 2.6.23
- From: Andi Kleen <[email protected]>
- Re: x86 status was Re: -mm merge plans for 2.6.23
- From: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
- Re: x86 status was Re: -mm merge plans for 2.6.23
- From: Andi Kleen <[email protected]>
- Re: x86 status was Re: -mm merge plans for 2.6.23
- From: Andrea Arcangeli <[email protected]>
- Re: x86 status was Re: -mm merge plans for 2.6.23
- From: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
- Re: x86 status was Re: -mm merge plans for 2.6.23
- From: Roman Zippel <[email protected]>
- Re: x86 status was Re: -mm merge plans for 2.6.23
- From: Mike Galbraith <[email protected]>
- Re: x86 status was Re: -mm merge plans for 2.6.23
- From: Roman Zippel <[email protected]>
- Re: x86 status was Re: -mm merge plans for 2.6.23
- From: Mike Galbraith <[email protected]>
- CFS review
- From: Roman Zippel <[email protected]>
- x86 status was Re: -mm merge plans for 2.6.23
- Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH 000 of 35] Refactor block layer to improve support for stacked devices.
- Next by Date: Re: [linux-usb-devel] [PATCH] USB BIOS early handoff only when the we the driver is configured
- Previous by thread: Re: CFS review
- Next by thread: Re: CFS review
- Index(es):
 |