Roman Zippel <zippel@linux-m68k.org> writes: > especially if one already knows that > scheduler clock has only limited resolution (because it's based on > jiffies), it becomes possible to use mostly 32bit values. jiffies based sched_clock should be soon very rare. It's probably not worth optimizing for it. -Andi - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: CFS review
- From: Roman Zippel <zippel@linux-m68k.org>
- Re: CFS review
- References:
- -mm merge plans for 2.6.23
- From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
- x86 status was Re: -mm merge plans for 2.6.23
- From: Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>
- Re: x86 status was Re: -mm merge plans for 2.6.23
- From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
- Re: x86 status was Re: -mm merge plans for 2.6.23
- From: Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>
- Re: x86 status was Re: -mm merge plans for 2.6.23
- From: Andrea Arcangeli <andrea@suse.de>
- Re: x86 status was Re: -mm merge plans for 2.6.23
- From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
- Re: x86 status was Re: -mm merge plans for 2.6.23
- From: Roman Zippel <zippel@linux-m68k.org>
- Re: x86 status was Re: -mm merge plans for 2.6.23
- From: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>
- Re: x86 status was Re: -mm merge plans for 2.6.23
- From: Roman Zippel <zippel@linux-m68k.org>
- Re: x86 status was Re: -mm merge plans for 2.6.23
- From: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>
- CFS review
- From: Roman Zippel <zippel@linux-m68k.org>
- -mm merge plans for 2.6.23
- Prev by Date: Re: [ck] Re: Linus 2.6.23-rc1
- Next by Date: Re: CFS review
- Previous by thread: Re: CFS review
- Next by thread: Re: CFS review
- Index(es):
 |