Roman Zippel <[email protected]> writes: > especially if one already knows that > scheduler clock has only limited resolution (because it's based on > jiffies), it becomes possible to use mostly 32bit values. jiffies based sched_clock should be soon very rare. It's probably not worth optimizing for it. -Andi - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: CFS review
- From: Roman Zippel <[email protected]>
- Re: CFS review
- References:
- -mm merge plans for 2.6.23
- From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
- x86 status was Re: -mm merge plans for 2.6.23
- From: Andi Kleen <[email protected]>
- Re: x86 status was Re: -mm merge plans for 2.6.23
- From: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
- Re: x86 status was Re: -mm merge plans for 2.6.23
- From: Andi Kleen <[email protected]>
- Re: x86 status was Re: -mm merge plans for 2.6.23
- From: Andrea Arcangeli <[email protected]>
- Re: x86 status was Re: -mm merge plans for 2.6.23
- From: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
- Re: x86 status was Re: -mm merge plans for 2.6.23
- From: Roman Zippel <[email protected]>
- Re: x86 status was Re: -mm merge plans for 2.6.23
- From: Mike Galbraith <[email protected]>
- Re: x86 status was Re: -mm merge plans for 2.6.23
- From: Roman Zippel <[email protected]>
- Re: x86 status was Re: -mm merge plans for 2.6.23
- From: Mike Galbraith <[email protected]>
- CFS review
- From: Roman Zippel <[email protected]>
- -mm merge plans for 2.6.23
- Prev by Date: Re: [ck] Re: Linus 2.6.23-rc1
- Next by Date: Re: CFS review
- Previous by thread: Re: CFS review
- Next by thread: Re: CFS review
- Index(es):
 |