On 8/1/07, Paul Mundt <[email protected]> wrote:
> The generic code has a better chance of being merged if it actually works
> at least and doesn't break every platform out there that has an existing
> stub. It offers quite a bit of new functionality and does clean things up
> a bit, so it would certainly be nice to get things to use that, rather
> than having to duplicate all of this crap in the architectures. If it's
> not going to be merged, everyone will of course continue using the
> existing in-tree stubs (sh, ppc, etc.).
ok, ive opened a tracker on our site for this
> It's generally advantageous to get these things working on your
> architecture _before_ things are merged however, as it's one less thing
> to catch up on after the fact. It also helps to figure out if there are
> issues with the current implementation by trying it out on your platform
> in advance, it's a lot more work to push back against it once it's
> already merged.
of course ... but if there isnt a serious chance of this being merged,
then it isnt in our (Blackfin's) interest to investigate it since our
current solution seems to be chugging alone fine
-mike
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
