Roman, Thanks for the testing and the feedback, it's much appreciated! :-) On what platform did you do your tests, and what .config did you use (and could you please send me your .config)? Please also send me the output of this script: http://people.redhat.com/mingo/cfs-scheduler/tools/cfs-debug-info.sh (if the output is too large send it to me privately, or bzip2 -9 it.) Could you also please send the source code for the "l.c" and "lt.c" apps you used for your testing so i can have a look. Thanks! Ingo - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: CFS review
- From: Roman Zippel <[email protected]>
- Re: CFS review
- From: Mike Galbraith <[email protected]>
- Re: CFS review
- References:
- x86 status was Re: -mm merge plans for 2.6.23
- From: Andi Kleen <[email protected]>
- Re: x86 status was Re: -mm merge plans for 2.6.23
- From: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
- Re: x86 status was Re: -mm merge plans for 2.6.23
- From: Andi Kleen <[email protected]>
- Re: x86 status was Re: -mm merge plans for 2.6.23
- From: Andrea Arcangeli <[email protected]>
- Re: x86 status was Re: -mm merge plans for 2.6.23
- From: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
- Re: x86 status was Re: -mm merge plans for 2.6.23
- From: Roman Zippel <[email protected]>
- Re: x86 status was Re: -mm merge plans for 2.6.23
- From: Mike Galbraith <[email protected]>
- Re: x86 status was Re: -mm merge plans for 2.6.23
- From: Roman Zippel <[email protected]>
- Re: x86 status was Re: -mm merge plans for 2.6.23
- From: Mike Galbraith <[email protected]>
- CFS review
- From: Roman Zippel <[email protected]>
- x86 status was Re: -mm merge plans for 2.6.23
- Prev by Date: Re: [ck] Re: Linus 2.6.23-rc1 -- It does not matter who's code gets merged!
- Next by Date: Re: [linux-usb-devel] [PATCH] USB BIOS early handoff only when the we the driver is configured
- Previous by thread: CFS review
- Next by thread: Re: CFS review
- Index(es):