Hi!
> > > diff --git a/arch/i386/kernel/acpi/wakeup.S b/arch/i386/kernel/acpi/wakeup.S
> > > index 1415da1..9cebef7 100644
> > > --- a/arch/i386/kernel/acpi/wakeup.S
> > > +++ b/arch/i386/kernel/acpi/wakeup.S
> > > @@ -28,21 +28,6 @@ #define BEEP \
> > > movb $15, %al; \
> > > outb %al, $66;
> > >
> > > -#define BEEP \
> > > - inb $97, %al; \
> > > - outb %al, $0x80; \
> > > - movb $3, %al; \
> > > - outb %al, $97; \
> > > - outb %al, $0x80; \
> > > - movb $-74, %al; \
> > > - outb %al, $67; \
> > > - outb %al, $0x80; \
> > > - movb $-119, %al; \
> > > - outb %al, $66; \
> > > - outb %al, $0x80; \
> > > - movb $15, %al; \
> > > - outb %al, $66;
> > > -
> > > ALIGN
> > > .align 4096
> > > ENTRY(wakeup_start)
> >
> > This hunk rejected for me (against 2.6.23-rc1), but i'm testing x86_64, so
> > it did not matter ;-)
>
> I think it's gone in favor of the more sophisticated beeping
> > > support.
No. It was merge problem on my side, I actually had _two_ times the
beeping macro.
Pavel
--
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
