On Tue, 31 Jul 2007, John Sigler wrote:
> As far as I understand, the Local APIC was integrated directly to the CPU
> 12-15 years ago. Why would a BIOS implementor choose to disable it?
Because they are lazy/incapable/out-of-time/select-your-favourite-excuse.
For the chip to work you have to provide some minimal support in the
firmware, in particular for the trickier paths of execution in the system
management mode. The system still works with the Local APIC disabled, so
why bother?
> (And what does it mean to "disable" the LAPIC?)
The LINT0 and LINT1 inputs of the APIC are routed straight to the INT and
NMI inputs of the CPU respectively and the rest of the APIC logic becomes
inactive (tri-stated, etc.).
Maciej
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
