> > oh, wonderful! Alan, you are a true wizard :-) The tty layer is one of > > the very few pieces of kernel code that scares the hell out of me :-) I'm not too fond of the way it does some stuff either especially the open v close v hangup paths but that is partly the fault of POSIX 8) > Maybe it should be kept crufty then. Every kernel developer should have > at least one part of the kernel he's afraid to go into ;-) floppy.c is sufficient - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- References:
- Linus 2.6.23-rc1
- From: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
- SD still better than CFS for 3d (was Re: 2.6.23-rc1)
- From: Kasper Sandberg <[email protected]>
- Re: SD still better than CFS for 3d ?(was Re: 2.6.23-rc1)
- From: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
- Re: SD still better than CFS for 3d ?(was Re: 2.6.23-rc1)
- From: Kasper Sandberg <[email protected]>
- Re: SD still better than CFS for 3d ?(was Re: 2.6.23-rc1)
- From: Peter Zijlstra <[email protected]>
- Re: SD still better than CFS for 3d ?(was Re: 2.6.23-rc1)
- From: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
- Re: SD still better than CFS for 3d ?(was Re: 2.6.23-rc1)
- From: Alan Cox <[email protected]>
- Re: SD still better than CFS for 3d ?(was Re: 2.6.23-rc1)
- From: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
- Re: SD still better than CFS for 3d ?(was Re: 2.6.23-rc1)
- From: Avi Kivity <[email protected]>
- Linus 2.6.23-rc1
- Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH] fs/gfs2: mark struct *_operations const
- Next by Date: [PATCH] documentation fixes
- Previous by thread: Re: SD still better than CFS for 3d ?(was Re: 2.6.23-rc1)
- Next by thread: Re: SD still better than CFS for 3d ?(was Re: 2.6.23-rc1)
- Index(es):
 |