Re: [linux-pm] Re: [PATCH 2/2] Introduce CONFIG_SUSPEND (updated)

Am Dienstag 31 Juli 2007 schrieb Rafael J. Wysocki:

> Well, the people on linux-pm seem to agree that the .suspend() and .resume()
> callbacks are not suitable for runtime power management, so having them
> built without SUSPEND or HIBERNATION wouldn't be very useful. ;-)

These are what USB runtime power management uses. How many code
paths for power management do you want to introduce?

	Regards
		Oliver
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: [linux-pm] Re: [PATCH 2/2] Introduce CONFIG_SUSPEND (updated)
    • From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <[email protected]>

• References:
  • [GIT PATCH] ACPI patches for 2.6.23-rc1
    • From: Len Brown <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH 2/2] Introduce CONFIG_SUSPEND (updated)
    • From: Len Brown <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH 2/2] Introduce CONFIG_SUSPEND (updated)
    • From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: SD still better than CFS for 3d ?(was Re: 2.6.23-rc1)
• Next by Date: Re: [rfc] balance-on-fork NUMA placement
• Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH 2/2] Introduce CONFIG_SUSPEND (updated)
• Next by thread: Re: [linux-pm] Re: [PATCH 2/2] Introduce CONFIG_SUSPEND (updated)
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]