Re: inotify and /proc/<pid>

Joseph Pingenot wrote:

While we're on the subject, is there some way to receive notification
  that some aspect of a process changes (in this case, stopping using
  CPU, but not exiting).

For some internal stuff a while back I did a patch that allows any process to register for status change notifications. Basically, the registered process gets put on a list and gets the same notifications (killed/stopped/exited, etc.) as the real parent.

Useful for this type of thing.

Chris
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• References:
  • inotify and /proc/<pid>
    • From: Joseph Pingenot <[email protected]>
  • Re: inotify and /proc/<pid>
    • From: Al Viro <[email protected]>
  • Re: inotify and /proc/<pid>
    • From: Joseph Pingenot <[email protected]>
  • Re: inotify and /proc/<pid>
    • From: Joseph Pingenot <[email protected]>
  • Re: inotify and /proc/<pid>
    • From: Al Viro <[email protected]>
  • Re: inotify and /proc/<pid>
    • From: Joseph Pingenot <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: [PATCH] fs/gfs2: mark struct *_operations const
• Next by Date: Re: [patch] add kdump_after_notifier
• Previous by thread: Re: inotify and /proc/<pid>
• Next by thread: Re: inotify and /proc/<pid>
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]