Re: [PATCH] flush icache before set_pte take6. [4/4] optimization for cpus other than montecito

On Tue, 31 Jul 2007 13:29:32 +0900
KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <[email protected]> wrote:

> On Mon, 30 Jul 2007 22:15:50 -0600
> "David Mosberger-Tang" <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> > This seems crazy to me.  Flushing should occur according to the
> > *architecture*, not model-by-model.  Even if we happen to get "lucky"
> > on pre-Montecito CPUs, that doesn't justify such ugly hacks.  
> 

BTW, how about the quality of patch[2/4] ?

If it is enough well, I want it to be merged....

please..
-Kame

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

References:
- [PATCH] flush icache before set_pte take6. [0/4]
  - From: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <[email protected]>
- [PATCH] flush icache before set_pte take6. [4/4] optimization for cpus other than montecito
  - From: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] flush icache before set_pte take6. [4/4] optimization for cpus other than montecito
  - From: "David Mosberger-Tang" <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] flush icache before set_pte take6. [4/4] optimization for cpus other than montecito
  - From: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH 0/5] x86_64 EFI support -v3
Next by Date: Re: [PATCH] add check do_direct_IO() return val
Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH] flush icache before set_pte take6. [4/4] optimization for cpus other than montecito
Next by thread: RE: [PATCH] flush icache before set_pte take6. [4/4] optimization for cpus other than montecito
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Kernel Newbies] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Photo] [Stuff] [Gimp] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Video 4 Linux] [Linux for the blind] [Linux Resources]