Re: 2.6.23-rc1, spamassassin vs rpc stuffs, rpc 1, spamassassin 0

> Comments anyone?

This is not specific to the kernel.
It was discussed here: http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/1/24/258
http://cyberelk.net/tim/portreserve/ seems to be the solution,
it's a pity it is not widely deployed.

Cheers.
-- 
Guillaume
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Follow-Ups:
- Re: 2.6.23-rc1, spamassassin vs rpc stuffs, rpc 1, spamassassin 0
  - From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>

References:
- 2.6.23-rc1, spamassassin vs rpc stuffs, rpc 1, spamassassin 0
  - From: Gene Heskett <gene.heskett@gmail.com>

Prev by Date: 2.6.23-rc1, spamassassin vs rpc stuffs, rpc 1, spamassassin 0
Next by Date: Re: [PATCH][hid] Fix a NULL pointer dereference when we fail to allocate memory
Previous by thread: 2.6.23-rc1, spamassassin vs rpc stuffs, rpc 1, spamassassin 0
Next by thread: Re: 2.6.23-rc1, spamassassin vs rpc stuffs, rpc 1, spamassassin 0
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Kernel Newbies] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Photo] [Stuff] [Gimp] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Video 4 Linux] [Linux for the blind] [Linux Resources]