Re: [-mm PATCH 6/9] Memory controller add per container LRU and reclaim (v4)

[Dhaval Giani <dhaval@linux.vnet.ibm.com>]

Hi Balbir,

> diff -puN mm/memcontrol.c~mem-control-lru-and-reclaim mm/memcontrol.c
> --- linux-2.6.23-rc1-mm1/mm/memcontrol.c~mem-control-lru-and-reclaim	2007-07-28 01:12:50.000000000 +0530
> +++ linux-2.6.23-rc1-mm1-balbir/mm/memcontrol.c	2007-07-28 01:12:50.000000000 +0530
 
>  /*
>   * The memory controller data structure. The memory controller controls both
> @@ -51,6 +54,10 @@ struct mem_container {
>  	 */
>  	struct list_head active_list;
>  	struct list_head inactive_list;
> +	/*
> +	 * spin_lock to protect the per container LRU
> +	 */
> +	spinlock_t lru_lock;
>  };

The spinlock is not annotated by lockdep. The following patch should do
it.

Signed-off-by: Dhaval Giani <dhaval@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Gautham Shenoy R <ego@in.ibm.com>


Index: linux-2.6.23-rc1/mm/memcontrol.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.23-rc1.orig/mm/memcontrol.c	2007-07-30 17:27:24.000000000 +0530
+++ linux-2.6.23-rc1/mm/memcontrol.c	2007-07-30 18:43:40.000000000 +0530
@@ -501,6 +501,9 @@
 
 static struct mem_container init_mem_container;
 
+/* lockdep should know about lru_lock */
+static struct lock_class_key lru_lock_key;
+
 static struct container_subsys_state *
 mem_container_create(struct container_subsys *ss, struct container *cont)
 {
@@ -519,6 +522,7 @@
 	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&mem->active_list);
 	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&mem->inactive_list);
 	spin_lock_init(&mem->lru_lock);
+	lockdep_set_class(&mem->lru_lock, &lru_lock_key);
 	mem->control_type = MEM_CONTAINER_TYPE_ALL;
 	return &mem->css;
 }
-- 
regards,
Dhaval

I would like to change the world but they don't give me the source code!
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/