* George Sescher <[email protected]> wrote:
> On 30/07/07, Ingo Molnar <[email protected]> wrote:
> > i'd encourage you to do it - in fact i already tried to prod Peter
> > Williams into doing exactly that ;) The more reality checks a
> > scheduler has, the better. [ Btw., after the obvious initial merging
> > trouble it should be much easier to keep SD maintained against
> > future upstream kernels due to the policy modularity that CFS
> > introduces. (and which policy-modularity should also help reduce the
> > size and complexity of the SD patch.) ]
>
> <chuckle>
>
> You're advocating plugsched now?
hm, the way you posited this question implies that you see an
inconsistency in my position or that it surprised you - i cannot explain
the '<chuckle>' in any other way :) Which bit do you see as inconsistent
and/or which bit surprised you and why?
Ingo
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
