From: Marcel Holtmann <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 27 Jul 2007 16:41:18 +0200
> > We loop through psm values, calling __l2cap_get_sock_by_addr(psm, ...)
> > until we get NULL; then we set ->psm of our socket to htobs(psm).
> > IOW, we find unused psm value and put it into our socket. So far, so
> > good, but... __l2cap_get_sock_by_addr() compares its argument with
> > ->psm of sockets. IOW, the entire thing works correctly only on
> > little-endian. On big-endian we'll get "no socket with such psm"
> > on the first iteration, since we won't find a socket with ->psm == 0x1001.
> > We will happily conclude that 0x1001 is unused and slap htobs(0x1001)
> > (i.e. 0x110) into ->psm of our socket. Of course, the next time around
> > the same thing will repeat and we'll just get a fsckload of sockets
> > with the same ->psm assigned.
> >
> > Fix: pass htobs(psm) to __l2cap_get_sock_by_addr() there. All other
> > callers are already passing little-endian values and all places that
> > store something in ->psm are storing little-endian.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Al Viro <[email protected]>
>
> Signed-off-by: Marcel Holtmann <[email protected]>
Applied.
> Dave, all four patches are good and should go in sooner than later. If
> you want me to put them into my tree first, then I can do that or you
> can apply them directly. You choice.
I'll take care of these, thanks.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
