Op Saturday 28 July 2007, schreef Linus Torvalds: <snip stuff i generally sagree with> > > Compare this to SD for a while. Ponder. > > Linus Your point here seems to be: this is how it went, and it was right. Ok, got that. Yet, Con walked away (and not just over SD). Seeing Con go, I wonder how many did leave without this splash. How many didn't even get involved at all??? Did THAT have to happen? I don't blame you for it - the point is that somewhere in the process a valuable kernel hacker went away. How and why? And is it due to a deeper problem? -- Disclaimer: Alles wat ik doe denk en zeg is gebaseerd op het wereldbeeld wat ik nu heb. Ik ben niet verantwoordelijk voor wijzigingen van de wereld, of het beeld wat ik daarvan heb, noch voor de daaruit voortvloeiende gedragingen van mezelf. Alles wat ik zeg is aardig bedoeld, tenzij expliciet vermeld. Please avoid sending me Word or PowerPoint attachments. See http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/no-word-attachments.html A: Because it destroys the flow of the conversation Q: Why is top-posting bad?
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [ck] Re: Linus 2.6.23-rc1
- From: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
- Re: [ck] Re: Linus 2.6.23-rc1
- From: Bill Huey (hui) <[email protected]>
- Re: [ck] Re: Linus 2.6.23-rc1
- References:
- Linus 2.6.23-rc1
- From: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
- Re: [ck] Re: Linus 2.6.23-rc1
- From: jos poortvliet <[email protected]>
- Re: [ck] Re: Linus 2.6.23-rc1
- From: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
- Linus 2.6.23-rc1
- Prev by Date: kernel panic w/ 2.6.22.1, VIA EPIA Mini ITX
- Next by Date: [PATCH] reiser4: use lzo library functions
- Previous by thread: Re: [ck] Re: Linus 2.6.23-rc1
- Next by thread: Re: [ck] Re: Linus 2.6.23-rc1
- Index(es):
 |