Re: CONFIG_SUSPEND? (was: Re: [GIT PATCH] ACPI patches for 2.6.23-rc1)

On Sat, 28 Jul 2007, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> 
> OK, I'll prepare a patch to introduce CONFIG_SUSPEND, but that will require
> quite a bit of (compilation) testing on different architectures.

Sure. I'm not too worried, the fallout should be of the trivial kind. 

Also, mind basing it on the (independent) cleanups that Adrian already 
sent out. This is all intertwined..

		Linus
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • [PATCH 0/2] Introduce CONFIG_HIBERNATION and CONFIG_SUSPEND (was: CONFIG_SUSPEND?)
    • From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <[email protected]>

• References:
  • [GIT PATCH] ACPI patches for 2.6.23-rc1
    • From: Len Brown <[email protected]>
  • Re: CONFIG_SUSPEND? (was: Re: [GIT PATCH] ACPI patches for 2.6.23-rc1)
    • From: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
  • Re: CONFIG_SUSPEND? (was: Re: [GIT PATCH] ACPI patches for 2.6.23-rc1)
    • From: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
  • Re: CONFIG_SUSPEND? (was: Re: [GIT PATCH] ACPI patches for 2.6.23-rc1)
    • From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: [ck] Re: Linus 2.6.23-rc1
• Next by Date: Re: NETPOLL=y , NETDEVICES=n compile error ( Re: 2.6.23-rc1-mm1 )
• Previous by thread: Re: CONFIG_SUSPEND? (was: Re: [GIT PATCH] ACPI patches for 2.6.23-rc1)
• Next by thread: [PATCH 0/2] Introduce CONFIG_HIBERNATION and CONFIG_SUSPEND (was: CONFIG_SUSPEND?)
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]