On Sat, 28 Jul 2007, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > OK, I'll prepare a patch to introduce CONFIG_SUSPEND, but that will require > quite a bit of (compilation) testing on different architectures. Sure. I'm not too worried, the fallout should be of the trivial kind. Also, mind basing it on the (independent) cleanups that Adrian already sent out. This is all intertwined.. Linus - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Follow-Ups:
- [PATCH 0/2] Introduce CONFIG_HIBERNATION and CONFIG_SUSPEND (was: CONFIG_SUSPEND?)
- From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>
- [PATCH 0/2] Introduce CONFIG_HIBERNATION and CONFIG_SUSPEND (was: CONFIG_SUSPEND?)
- References:
- [GIT PATCH] ACPI patches for 2.6.23-rc1
- From: Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>
- Re: CONFIG_SUSPEND? (was: Re: [GIT PATCH] ACPI patches for 2.6.23-rc1)
- From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
- Re: CONFIG_SUSPEND? (was: Re: [GIT PATCH] ACPI patches for 2.6.23-rc1)
- From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
- Re: CONFIG_SUSPEND? (was: Re: [GIT PATCH] ACPI patches for 2.6.23-rc1)
- From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>
- [GIT PATCH] ACPI patches for 2.6.23-rc1
- Prev by Date: Re: [ck] Re: Linus 2.6.23-rc1
- Next by Date: Re: NETPOLL=y , NETDEVICES=n compile error ( Re: 2.6.23-rc1-mm1 )
- Previous by thread: Re: CONFIG_SUSPEND? (was: Re: [GIT PATCH] ACPI patches for 2.6.23-rc1)
- Next by thread: [PATCH 0/2] Introduce CONFIG_HIBERNATION and CONFIG_SUSPEND (was: CONFIG_SUSPEND?)
- Index(es):
 |