On Jul 28 2007 13:36, Bernd Petrovitsch wrote:
>
>Unless I misunderstand the question, the "write" and "writev" function
>of the "struct file_operations" should return an appropriate error value
>(which is here -EACCES).
>You may think of returning an error in the "open" if someone wants to
>open it to write to it (so that the must open it read-only).
>But I don't know if that is common practice or not (or even disliked) as
>it may interfere with not properly implemented tools which open devices
>read-write even if they never write to it.
Yes it is, I believe. When mount(8) gets an error from mount(2),
it retries with MS_RDONLY enabled.
Jan
--
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
