Daniel Cheng wrote: > but merging maps2 have higher risk which should be done in a development > branch (er... 2.7, but we don't have it now). This is off-topic and has been discussed to death, but: Rather than one stable branch and one development branch, we have a few stable branches and a lot of development branches. Some are located at git.kernel.org. Among else, this gives you a predictable release rythm and very timely updated stable branches. -- Stefan Richter -=====-=-=== -=== ===-- http://arcgraph.de/sr/ - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- References:
- -mm merge plans for 2.6.23
- From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
- Re: -mm merge plans for 2.6.23
- From: "Jesper Juhl" <jesper.juhl@gmail.com>
- Re: -mm merge plans for 2.6.23
- From: Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au>
- Re: -mm merge plans for 2.6.23
- From: "Ray Lee" <ray-lk@madrabbit.org>
- Re: -mm merge plans for 2.6.23
- From: Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au>
- Re: -mm merge plans for 2.6.23
- From: "Ray Lee" <ray-lk@madrabbit.org>
- Re: -mm merge plans for 2.6.23
- From: Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au>
- Re: -mm merge plans for 2.6.23
- From: Rene Herman <rene.herman@gmail.com>
- Re: -mm merge plans for 2.6.23
- From: Eric St-Laurent <ericstl34@sympatico.ca>
- Re: -mm merge plans for 2.6.23
- From: Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au>
- Re: -mm merge plans for 2.6.23
- From: "Ray Lee" <ray-lk@madrabbit.org>
- Re: -mm merge plans for 2.6.23
- From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
- Re: -mm merge plans for 2.6.23
- From: Daniel Cheng <gmane@sdiz.net>
- -mm merge plans for 2.6.23
- Prev by Date: Re: serial flow control appears broken
- Next by Date: Re: Linus 2.6.23-rc1
- Previous by thread: Re: -mm merge plans for 2.6.23
- Next by thread: Re: -mm merge plans for 2.6.23
- Index(es):
![]() |