Adrian Bunk wrote: > On Fri, Jul 27, 2007 at 03:57:39PM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote: >> [ For extra bonus points: the SUSPEND_POSSIBLE thing is still pretty >> complicated, and it might actually be a better idea to make it a >> per-arch config option, ... > This would give you "trying to assign nonexistent symbol SUSPEND_POSSIBLE" > kconfig warnings on architectures without SUSPEND_POSSIBLE. Unless /all/ architectures define it, of course. -- Stefan Richter -=====-=-=== -=== ===-- http://arcgraph.de/sr/ - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- References:
- [GIT PATCH] ACPI patches for 2.6.23-rc1
- From: Len Brown <[email protected]>
- CONFIG_SUSPEND? (was: Re: [GIT PATCH] ACPI patches for 2.6.23-rc1)
- From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <[email protected]>
- Re: CONFIG_SUSPEND? (was: Re: [GIT PATCH] ACPI patches for 2.6.23-rc1)
- From: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
- Re: CONFIG_SUSPEND? (was: Re: [GIT PATCH] ACPI patches for 2.6.23-rc1)
- From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <[email protected]>
- Re: CONFIG_SUSPEND? (was: Re: [GIT PATCH] ACPI patches for 2.6.23-rc1)
- From: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
- [2.6 patch] let SUSPEND select HOTPLUG_CPU
- From: Adrian Bunk <[email protected]>
- Re: [2.6 patch] let SUSPEND select HOTPLUG_CPU
- From: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
- [2.6 patch] SOFTWARE_SUSPEND: handle HOTPLUG_CPU automatically
- From: Adrian Bunk <[email protected]>
- [GIT PATCH] ACPI patches for 2.6.23-rc1
- Prev by Date: Re: RFT: updatedb "morning after" problem [was: Re: -mm merge plans for 2.6.23]
- Next by Date: Re: [PATCH] MIPS: add smp_call_function_single()
- Previous by thread: [2.6 patch] SOFTWARE_SUSPEND: handle HOTPLUG_CPU automatically
- Next by thread: Re: [2.6 patch] let SUSPEND select HOTPLUG_CPU
- Index(es):
 |