Re: [PATCH 12/68] 0 -> NULL, for arch/powerpc

Yoann Padioleau writes:

> When comparing a pointer, it's clearer to compare it to NULL than to 0.

As other people have said, if you're going to spend time on this,
testing (!buf) is more idiomatic in the kernel than (buf == NULL).

Paul.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• References:
  • [PATCH 12/68] 0 -> NULL, for arch/powerpc
    • From: Yoann Padioleau <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: Linus 2.6.23-rc1
• Next by Date: Re: [PATCH] Documentation: document HFSPlus
• Previous by thread: [PATCH 12/68] 0 -> NULL, for arch/powerpc
• Next by thread: [PATCH 13/68] 0 -> NULL, for arch/ppc
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]