* Pavel Machek ([email protected]) wrote:
> I believe there's still a lot that can be merged, and I'm responsible
> for some of it. Parts of suspend code should be shared, yet they are
> in differently named files in differently named directories.
>
> Ok, I guess I should fix it, arch/x86 or not.
Funny, I was just looking at that code specifically. Yes, it would be
useful to share. It will need some wrappers for the asm which are now
paravirt on i386 and still raw on x86_64 (have those handy if you need
them).
thanks,
-chris
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- References:
- [RFC, Announce] Unified x86 architecture, arch/x86
- Re: [RFC, Announce] Unified x86 architecture, arch/x86
- Re: [RFC, Announce] Unified x86 architecture, arch/x86
- Re: [RFC, Announce] Unified x86 architecture, arch/x86
- Re: [RFC, Announce] Unified x86 architecture, arch/x86
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]