Re: [PATCH 02/68] 0 -> NULL, for arch/arm

On Fri, Jul 27, 2007 at 02:18:59PM +0200, Jan Engelhardt wrote:
> >bool variables are rarely named buf, so no.
> 
> Whatever. Java is good in one point: the ! operator requires a bool.

Language and style advocacy -> that way.  Use of scalar types, including
pointers, in conditional contexts is both 100% legal and, what's more
important, idiomatic C.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• References:
  • [PATCH 02/68] 0 -> NULL, for arch/arm
    • From: Yoann Padioleau <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH 02/68] 0 -> NULL, for arch/arm
    • From: Al Viro <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH 02/68] 0 -> NULL, for arch/arm
    • From: Jan Engelhardt <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH 02/68] 0 -> NULL, for arch/arm
    • From: "Alexey Dobriyan" <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH 02/68] 0 -> NULL, for arch/arm
    • From: Jan Engelhardt <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH 10/68] 0 -> NULL, for arch/mips
• Next by Date: Re: updatedb
• Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH 02/68] 0 -> NULL, for arch/arm
• Next by thread: Re: [PATCH 02/68] 0 -> NULL, for arch/arm
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]