When comparing a pointer, it's clearer to compare it to NULL than to 0.
Here is an excerpt of the semantic patch:
@@
expression *E;
@@
E ==
- 0
+ NULL
@@
expression *E;
@@
E !=
- 0
+ NULL
Signed-off-by: Yoann Padioleau <[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected]
Cc: [email protected]
Cc: [email protected]
---
traps.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/arch/blackfin/kernel/traps.c b/arch/blackfin/kernel/traps.c
index 3909f5b..691c66d 100644
--- a/arch/blackfin/kernel/traps.c
+++ b/arch/blackfin/kernel/traps.c
@@ -546,7 +546,7 @@ void dump_bfin_regs(struct pt_regs *fp,
}
printk(KERN_EMERG "return address: [0x%p]; contents of:", retaddr);
- if (retaddr != 0 && retaddr <= (void *)physical_mem_end
+ if (retaddr != NULL && retaddr <= (void *)physical_mem_end
#if L1_CODE_LENGTH != 0
/* FIXME: Copy the code out of L1 Instruction SRAM through dma
memcpy. */
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
