Re: [PATCH] IPv6: ipv6_addr_type() doesn't know about RFC4193 addresses

In article <[email protected]> (at Wed, 25 Jul 2007 17:12:03 -0700 (PDT)), David Miller <[email protected]> says:

> Contrarily, there may be ipv6_addr_type() call sites that really
> do want to reject rfc4193 addresses.

I do not think we have such users.

--yoshfuji
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• References:
  • [PATCH] IPv6: ipv6_addr_type() doesn't know about RFC4193 addresses
    • From: Dave Johnson <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH] IPv6: ipv6_addr_type() doesn't know about RFC4193 addresses
    • From: David Miller <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: [Question] Hooks for scheduler tracing (CFS)
• Next by Date: [patch] sched: introduce SD_BALANCE_FORK for ht/mc/smp domains
• Previous by thread: Re: [Lksctp-developers] [PATCH] IPv6: ipv6_addr_type() doesn't know about RFC4193 addresses
• Next by thread: Re: [PATCH] IPv6: ipv6_addr_type() doesn't know about RFC4193 addresses
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]