On Thu, 26 Jul 2007, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>
> On my Turion64-based HPC nx6325 with the 2.6.23-rc1 x86_64 kernel doing
>
> # echo 0 > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu1/online
>
> causes the system to crash in a spectacular fashion (call traces going
> continuously on the console, no reaction to anything except for the power
> button). For this reason, suspend and hibernation don't work as well.
Yeah, I really shouldn't have applied that patch. I didn't notice that it
not only cleaned up the direct memcpy's, it also re-introduced the damn
broken code that we fixed once already.
Dammit, that read-only debug support IS NOT WORTH THIS CRAP.
I absolutely *detest* it when "debugging features" end up being the thing
that causes crashes. I think it shows a total lack of taste and
understanding, and I'm totally tired of it. This has happened too many
times.
Andi: please don't send this patch *ever* again. If a patch that is
supposed to help debugging just causes problems, that patch should be
thrown away FOREVER.
Andrew - on that same note: please throw away the dwarf traceback crap
from your tree that Andi is still apparently pushing. Exact same issue.
Debugging "helper" code that has historically only caused problems. We
could equally well just enable frame pointers for debugging and add the
trivial code to follow that instead, and it would work (the way it has
worked on x86 basically forever).
Rafael, does reverting just this part (and leaving the "text_poke()"
cleanups) work for you?
Linus
---
arch/i386/kernel/alternative.c | 10 ----------
arch/i386/mm/init.c | 14 +++++++++++---
arch/x86_64/mm/init.c | 10 ++++++++++
3 files changed, 21 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/i386/kernel/alternative.c b/arch/i386/kernel/alternative.c
index c3750c2..c0d0a89 100644
--- a/arch/i386/kernel/alternative.c
+++ b/arch/i386/kernel/alternative.c
@@ -432,20 +432,10 @@ void __init alternative_instructions(void)
*/
void __kprobes text_poke(void *oaddr, unsigned char *opcode, int len)
{
- u8 *addr = oaddr;
- if (!pte_write(*lookup_address((unsigned long)addr))) {
- struct page *p[2] = { virt_to_page(addr), virt_to_page(addr+PAGE_SIZE) };
- addr = vmap(p, 2, VM_MAP, PAGE_KERNEL);
- if (!addr)
- return;
- addr += ((unsigned long)oaddr) % PAGE_SIZE;
- }
memcpy(addr, opcode, len);
sync_core();
/* Not strictly needed, but can speed CPU recovery up. Ignore cross cacheline
case. */
if (cpu_has_clflush)
asm("clflush (%0) " :: "r" (oaddr) : "memory");
- if (addr != oaddr)
- vunmap(addr);
}
diff --git a/arch/i386/mm/init.c b/arch/i386/mm/init.c
index 1b1a1e6..4c4809f 100644
--- a/arch/i386/mm/init.c
+++ b/arch/i386/mm/init.c
@@ -800,9 +800,17 @@ void mark_rodata_ro(void)
unsigned long start = PFN_ALIGN(_text);
unsigned long size = PFN_ALIGN(_etext) - start;
- change_page_attr(virt_to_page(start),
- size >> PAGE_SHIFT, PAGE_KERNEL_RX);
- printk("Write protecting the kernel text: %luk\n", size >> 10);
+#ifndef CONFIG_KPROBES
+#ifdef CONFIG_HOTPLUG_CPU
+ /* It must still be possible to apply SMP alternatives. */
+ if (num_possible_cpus() <= 1)
+#endif
+ {
+ change_page_attr(virt_to_page(start),
+ size >> PAGE_SHIFT, PAGE_KERNEL_RX);
+ printk("Write protecting the kernel text: %luk\n", size >> 10);
+ }
+#endif
start += size;
size = (unsigned long)__end_rodata - start;
change_page_attr(virt_to_page(start),
diff --git a/arch/x86_64/mm/init.c b/arch/x86_64/mm/init.c
index 38f5d63..458893b 100644
--- a/arch/x86_64/mm/init.c
+++ b/arch/x86_64/mm/init.c
@@ -600,6 +600,16 @@ void mark_rodata_ro(void)
{
unsigned long start = (unsigned long)_stext, end;
+#ifdef CONFIG_HOTPLUG_CPU
+ /* It must still be possible to apply SMP alternatives. */
+ if (num_possible_cpus() > 1)
+ start = (unsigned long)_etext;
+#endif
+
+#ifdef CONFIG_KPROBES
+ start = (unsigned long)__start_rodata;
+#endif
+
end = (unsigned long)__end_rodata;
start = (start + PAGE_SIZE - 1) & PAGE_MASK;
end &= PAGE_MASK;
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
