Frank Ch. Eigler wrote:
Mathieu Desnoyers <[email protected]> writes:
[...]
The problem is also in _stp_print_flush, not *only* in relay code:
void _stp_print_flush (void)
...
spin_lock(&_stp_print_lock);
...
spin_unlock(&_stp_print_lock);
Those will turn into mutexes with -rt.
Indeed, plus systemtap-generated locking code uses rwlocks,
local_irq_save/restore or preempt_disable, in various places. Could
someone point to a place that spells out what would be more
appropriate way of ensuring atomicity while being compatible with -rt?
https://ols2006.108.redhat.com/2007/Reprints/rostedt-Reprint.pdf
And his slides too, haven't checked if they are already only at the OLS
site.
- Arnaldo
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
