On Thu, July 26, 2007 11:10 pm, Alan Cox wrote:
>> The handler does handle the interrupt - both status and data registers
>> are read so from the keyboard controller point of view the interrupt
>> has been handled even if we happen to discard the data. As far as I
>> know IRQ12 is never shared by BIOS... Vojtech, do you remember why we
>> request IRQ12 with IRQF_SHARED?
>
> A small number of boxes do share IRQ12 and it was switched to shared for
> them.
If that is the case interrupt handlers should be able to determine whether
a certain interrupt comes from their respective devices, and return
IRQ_HANDLED or IRQ_NONE accordingly. Returning IRQ_HANDLED unconditionally
when IRQF_SHARED is set seems strange. Is this behavior intended?
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
